the traders have so much clout in washington that i bet the s.e.c. couldn't even order them to do that. blow back would be too huge. like not worth the effort. still though sometimes that's the breaks. why isn't there product safety here? why can't the government say if you want to handle the stocks you have to have a redundant system? and because no one came forward from the nasdaq to say anything on a timely basis, why didn't someone from the s.e.c. demand that someone come to the nasdaq studio and come forward, tell us what's wrong. tell us what's happening? why can't someone from the government express outrage at something that's outrageous? i have a thought about why these things occur. it's not that the system is too complicated, it's obvious that's the case. no, my theory is this. many professionals have become inured to this kind of nonsense. they say, look it comes with the territory. they shrug their shoulder, throw up their hands, well too bad. well, it is too bad. and you shouldn't shrug your shoulders, but there's no sense of outrage any